Ethereal Mechanics (EM)
The Simplest Theory of Everything.
This science was developed over that past 30 years by Robert J. Distinti M.S. ECE
The Simplest Theory of Everything.
This science was developed over that past 30 years by Robert J. Distinti M.S. ECE
Everything is explained in terms of simple mechanics to include Time Dilation (it is not actually time that is dilating ) and Length Contraction (plus others that Relativity missed -- see the Transvariance Paper). There is no need for voodoo physics with silly singularities, probability superpositions, entanglements, spooky actions at a distance or spooky action with no causal explanation at all (Time Dilation, Length Contraction).Relativity has a model for gravity but no model for matter; conversely, Quantum Mechanics/Standard model are an attempt to explain matter; however, there is no model for gravity. This impasse has been going on for 60 years. It is paradoxical to have a model for gravity that is supposedly generated by matter and couples to matter and not have a model of matter that explains how the field is generated or coupled. Ethereal Mechanics has a model for matter that explains the gravitational field (The generation)and the gravitational force (the coupling to matter). The legacy paper New Gravity (ng.pdf) shows the coupling and a primitive version of the model of matter (MOM). From simple models of matter that explain the origins, and deaths, of galaxies, to work-arounds that allow Faster-Than-Light star ships. EM explains everything from the large scale, and small scale that Relativity and Quantum Mechanics can not.
This all started in 1994 when a problem was noticed with Faraday's Law of induction. That led to a new model of induction that looked just like F=Ma. The new model is called New Induction. See the Foundation Series Play-list for the development of New induction. This New model of induction became the impetus to rewrite EM theory which eventually led to New Electromagnetism Version 3 and the original gravity paper from 1999 called New Gravity. After the successful demonstration of the superiority of New Induction (Inertia Force) over classical theory in 2007 (see Graduate Thesis Link below), I set out to complete the unification between gravity and electromagnetism. There were many false ends; but one common problem arose, a need for a means to divide vectors. I spent the next few years developing what is now Vortrix Algebra. The final stumbling block was magnetism. This required the exploration of the reference frame of magnetism which resulted in the identification of missing compensations for the Michelson Morley experiment resulting in the development of Transvariance (see link below). A second obstacle was the ambiguity of mass which was eliminated in the Constructs Paper (among other things). This all cleared the way for Electrogravity (see the Electrogravity link for more detailed history of Electrogravity). This paved the way for New Electromagnetism Version 5
Below are the links to the main sequence papers (EMxx). Some of the links go to Other pages, others just open a pdf. Below the main sequence papers, are the links to supporting work.
Special Relativity does a poor job of adequately explaining the natural variations affecting objects in translation (Transvariances).
More transvariances are uncovered using a high-fidelity computer model of the Michelson-Morley experiment. Along with Length Contraction and Time Dilation, there are variations in
Light Reflection
Field Emissions
And more..
The link is to the .pdf version of the Transvariance paper which is formally copyrighted and on file with the U.S. Government. The PDF contains links to you-tube videos which demonstrate the simulations. Patreon Engineers have access to the source code for the simulator and Patreon First Class passengers have access to the executable
Science needs a new foundation; free of the arbitrary and ambiguous constructs that have been around since the days of the horse and buggy. For example, science disambiguated weight from quantity(mass) about 300 years ago. Then 100 years ago Einstein claimed that weight and inertia were equivalent. So why hasn't science disambiguated inertia from quantity as well? The construct mass is used ambiguously to describe both the quantity of stuff and the inertia of stuff. This ambiguity is hiding the simple underlying truths of nature.
The constructs paper explains the new constructs that will serve as the foundation of Ethereal Mechanics going forward
Electrogravity is the Nexus of Gravity and Electromagnetism. Electrogravity demonstrate how Matter and the Forces of Nature are derived from Ether (Ethonics) and Precursory Matter (Pretonics).
New Electromagnetism Version 5 demonstrates new couplings that have been uncovered with the Paradox Experiments. The older versions of New Electromagnetism NE3 and NE4 are a vast improvement over Maxwell's Equations and are sufficient for the simplified models discussed in EM03; however, they are insufficient to support a complete model of matter .
The Large Scale Ether Model is applied to Solar Systems, Galaxies and beyond to demonstrate and derive the correct values for
Stellar Aberration
Precession of Mercury
Black Hole properties
Galactic Shapes and Formation
And More...
Teaser: When the Dark Matter Went
Continuation of Electrogravity
Discusses Ethereal Energy content, E= MC^2,
The Second Preton Feeding Mode,
More findamental model of energy
Release Date TBD
...........
Release Date TBD
.......
Release Date TBD
An improvement over vector algebra which includes a deterministic vector multiply and divide. This is the only body of mathematics that properly reconciles that vector products result in matrices thus providing the only non-imaginary solution to sqrt(-1) (the GA solution is shown to be gibberish). VA is the unification of all mathematics and is a suitable replacement for vector algebra, quaternions, GA, complex algebra and basic arithmetic (VA in 1 dimension).
Scientific reasoning and logic is improperly taught to scientist and engineers (if at all). Most falsely believe that if experimental results agree with a theory, that the theory must be true and irrefutable. It is this kind of wrong thinking that stagnates scientific progress. The Rules of Acquisition will blow your mind at how much the scientific method is still hamstrung by arcane and tribal thinking.
Discussion of a broad range of topics from the subtle flaws of General Relativity to the insane clown world that is Quantum Mechanics.
I see many things differently than the rest of the world. Here are some of them. I add to this when Ethereal Mechanics is slow.
